RPE65-Associated Retinal Dystrophies: Phenotypes and Treatment Effects with Voretigene Neparvovec.

Retinal dystrophies linked to the RPE65 gene are mostly fast-progressing retinal diseases, with childhood onset of night blindness and progressive visual loss up to the middle adult age. Rare phenotypes linked to this gene are known with congenital stationary night blindness or slowly progressing retinitis pigmentosa, as well as an autosomal dominant c.1430A>G (p.Asp477Gly) variant. This review gives an overview of the current knowledge of the clinical phenotypes, as well as experience with the efficacy and safety of the approved gene augmentation therapy voretigene neparvovec.

Protocol for the treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to retinitis pigmentosa and other inherited retinal dystrophies.

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) are the leading cause of legal blindness in the working population. Cystic macular edema (CME) is one of the treatable causes of visual loss, affecting up to 50% of the patients. A bibliographic review has been carried out combining "inherited retinal dystrophy", "retinitis pigmentosa", "macular oedema" and a diagnostic-therapeutic protocol according to the levels of evidence and recommendations of the "US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality". This protocol has been discussed in the monthly meetings of the XAREA DHR group with the participation of more than 25 ophthalmologists, creating a consensus document. The etiology of CME is multifactorial: dysfunction of the blood-retinal barrier, retinal pigment epithelium, and Müller cells, inflammation, and vitreous traction. OCT is the test of choice for the diagnosis and follow-up of CME associated with IRD. The drugs with the highest degree of scientific evidence are carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (IAC). Intravitreal corticosteroids, anti-VEGF, and vitrectomy with peeling of the internal limiting membrane do not have sufficient evidence. A treatment scheme is proposed for the CME in IRD in adults, another for pediatric patients and another for IRD and cataract surgery. Oral and topical IACs are effective in the treatment of CME secondary to IRD. Treatment with corticosteroids, anti-VEGF, and vitrectomy are second-line options. Randomized clinical trials are required to establish the therapeutic scale in these patients.

Single Center Experience with Voretigene Neparvovec Gene Augmentation Therapy in RPE65 Mutation-Associated Inherited Retinal Degeneration in a Clinical Setting.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of baseline data on psychophysical and morphological outcomes of subretinal voretigene neparvovec (VN) (Luxturna, Spark Therapeutics, Inc.) treatment. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective, longitudinal, consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with RPE65-biallelic mutation-associated inherited retinal degeneration (RPE65-IRD) treated between February 2020 and March 2022 with VN and oral immunosuppression according to the manufacturer's recommendation by one surgeon (F.G.H.). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of surgical and clinical records, ancillary testing, and retinal imaging after VN therapy for RPE65-IRD. Descriptive statistics compared data at baseline up to 32 months post-treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance VA (LLVA), Goldmann visual fields (GVFs), chromatic full-field stimulus threshold (FST) testing (FST), scotopic and photopic 2-color threshold perimetry (2CTP), and multimodal retinal imaging. RESULTS: Thirty eyes of 19 patients were analyzed (10 pediatric patients < 20 years; 20 adult patients > 20 years of age; overall range: 8-40 years) with a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 1-32). The fovea was completely or partially detached in 16 eyes, attached in 12 eyes, and not assessable in 2 eyes on intraoperative imaging. Median BCVA at baseline was better in the pediatric group (P < 0.05) and did not change significantly independent of age. Meaningful loss of BCVA (≥ 0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) occurred in 5 of 18 adult eyes, and a meaningful gain (≥-0.3 logMAR) occurred in 2 of 18 adult and 2 of 8 pediatric eyes. The LLVA and scotopic 2CTP improved considerably in pediatric patients. Scotopic blue FST improved at all ages but more in pediatric patients (8/8 eyes gained ≥ 10 decibels [dB]; P < 0.05). In pediatric patients, median GVF improved by 20% for target V4e and by 50% for target III4e (target I4e not detected). Novel atrophy developed in 13 of 26 eyes at the site of the bleb or peripheral of vascular arcades. Improvements in FST did not correlate with development of chorioretinal atrophy at 12 months. Mean central retinal thickness was 165.87 µm (± 26.26) at baseline (30 eyes) and 157.69 µm (± 30.3) at 12 months (26 eyes). Eight adult patients were treated unilaterally. The untreated eyes did not show meaningful changes during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These data in a clinical setting show the effectiveness of VN therapy with stable median BCVA and mean retinal thickness and improvements of LLVA, FST, and 2CTP up to 32 months. Treatment effects were superior in the pediatric group. We observed new chorioretinal atrophy in 50% of the treated eyes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Outcomes and Adverse Effects of Voretigene Neparvovec Treatment for Biallelic RPE65-Mediated Inherited Retinal Dystrophies in a Cohort of Patients from a Single Center.

Our study evaluated the morphological and functional outcomes, and the side effects, of voretigene neparvovec (VN) gene therapy for RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) in 12 eyes (six patients) at the Oxford Eye Hospital with a mean follow-up duration of 8.2 (range 1-12) months. All patients reported a subjective vision improvement 1 month after gene therapy. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) remained stable (baseline: 1.28 (±0.71) vs. last follow-up: 1.46 (±0.60); p = 0.25). Average white Full-Field Stimulus Testing (FST) showed a trend towards improvement (baseline: -4.41 (±10.62) dB vs. last follow-up: -11.98 (±13.83) dB; p = 0.18). No changes in central retinal thickness or macular volume were observed. The side effects included mild intraocular inflammation (two eyes) and cataracts (four eyes). Retinal atrophy occurred in 10 eyes (eight mild, two severe) but did not impact FST measurements during the follow-up period. Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) was noted in three patients (six eyes); four eyes (two patients) required glaucoma surgery. The overall safety and effectiveness of VN treatment in our cohort align with previous VN clinical trials, except for the higher occurrence of retinal atrophy and increased IOP in our cohort. This suggests that raised IOP and retinal atrophy may be more common than previously reported.

Gene Therapy in Hereditary Retinal Dystrophies: The Usefulness of Diagnostic Tools in Candidate Patient Selections.

PURPOSE: Gene therapy actually seems to have promising results in the treatment of Leber Congenital Amaurosis and some different inherited retinal diseases (IRDs); the primary goal of this strategy is to change gene defects with a wild-type gene without defects in a DNA sequence to achieve partial recovery of the photoreceptor function and, consequently, partially restore lost retinal functions. This approach led to the introduction of a new drug (voretigene neparvovec-rzyl) for replacement of the RPE65 gene in patients affected by Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA); however, the treatment results are inconstant and with variable long-lasting effects due to a lack of correctly evaluating the anatomical and functional conditions of residual photoreceptors. These variabilities may also be related to host immunoreactive reactions towards the Adenovirus-associated vector. A broad spectrum of retinal dystrophies frequently generates doubt as to whether the disease or the patient is a good candidate for a successful gene treatment, because, very often, different diseases share similar genetic characteristics, causing an inconstant genotype/phenotype correlation between clinical characteristics also within the same family. For example, mutations on the RPE65 gene cause Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) but also some forms of Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Bardet Biedl Syndrome (BBS), Congenital Stationary Night Blindness (CSNB) and Usher syndrome (USH), with a very wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. These confusing elements are due to the different pathways in which the product protein (retinoid isomer-hydrolase) is involved and, consequently, the overlapping metabolism in retinal function. Considering this point and the cost of the drug (over USD one hundred thousand), it would be mandatory to follow guidelines or algorithms to assess the best-fitting disease and candidate patients to maximize the output. Unfortunately, at the moment, there are no suggestions regarding who to treat with gene therapy. Moreover, gene therapy might be helpful in other forms of inherited retinal dystrophies, with more frequent incidence of the disease and better functional conditions (actually, gene therapy is proposed only for patients with poor vision, considering possible side effects due to the treatment procedures), in which this approach leads to better function and, hopefully, visual restoration. But, in this view, who might be a disease candidate or patient to undergo gene therapy, in relationship to the onset of clinical trials for several different forms of IRD? Further, what is the gold standard for tests able to correctly select the patient? Our work aims to evaluate clinical considerations on instrumental morphofunctional tests to assess candidate subjects for treatment and correlate them with clinical and genetic defect analysis that, often, is not correspondent. We try to define which parameters are an essential and indispensable part of the clinical rationale to select patients with IRDs for gene therapy. This review will describe a series of models used to characterize retinal morphology and function from tests, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and electrophysiological evaluation (ERG), and its evaluation as a primary outcome in clinical trials. A secondary aim is to propose an ancillary clinical classification of IRDs and their accessibility based on gene therapy's current state of the art. MATERIAL AND METHODS: OCT, ERG, and visual field examinations were performed in different forms of IRDs, classified based on clinical and retinal conditions; compared to the gene defect classification, we utilized a diagnostic algorithm for the clinical classification based on morphofunctional information of the retina of patients, which could significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and, consequently, help the ophthalmologist to make a correct diagnosis to achieve optimal clinical results. These considerations are very helpful in selecting IRD patients who might respond to gene therapy with possible therapeutic success and filter out those in which treatment has a lower chance or no chance of positive results due to bad retinal conditions, avoiding time-consuming patient management with unsatisfactory results.

A multidisciplinary approach to inherited retinal dystrophies from diagnosis to initial care: a narrative review with inputs from clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Non-syndromic inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) such as retinitis pigmentosa or Leber congenital amaurosis generally manifest between early childhood and late adolescence, imposing profound long-term impacts as a result of vision impairment or blindness. IRDs are highly heterogeneous, with often overlapping symptoms among different IRDs, and achieving a definite diagnosis is challenging. This narrative review provides a clinical overview of the non-syndromic generalized photoreceptor dystrophies, particularly retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis. The clinical investigations and genetic testing needed to establish a diagnosis are outlined, and current management approaches are discussed, focusing on the importance of the involvement of an interdisciplinary team from diagnosis and initial care to long-term follow-up and support. RESULTS: The effective management of IRDs requires a multidisciplinary, and ideally interdisciplinary, team of experts knowledgeable about IRDs, with experienced professionals from fields as diverse as ophthalmology, neuropsychiatry, psychology, neurology, genetics, orthoptics, developmental therapy, typhlology, occupational therapy, otolaryngology, and orientation and mobility specialties. Accurate clinical diagnosis encompasses a range of objective and subjective assessments as a prerequisite for the genetic testing essential in establishing an accurate diagnosis necessary for the effective management of IRDs, particularly in the era of gene therapies. Improvements in genome sequencing techniques, such as next-generation sequencing, have greatly facilitated the complex process of determining IRD-causing gene variants and establishing a molecular diagnosis. Genetic counseling is essential to help the individual and their family understand the condition, the potential risk for offspring, and the implications of a diagnosis on visual prognosis and treatment options. Psychological support for patients and caregivers is important at all stages of diagnosis, care, and rehabilitation and is an essential part of the multidisciplinary approach to managing IRDs. Effective communication throughout is essential, and the patient and caregivers' needs and expectations must be acknowledged and discussed. CONCLUSION: As IRDs can present at an early age, clinicians need to be aware of the clinical signs suggesting visual impairment and follow up with multidisciplinary support for timely diagnoses to facilitate appropriate therapeutic or rehabilitation intervention to minimize vision loss.

How to Set Up Genetic Counselling for Inherited Macular Dystrophies: Focus on Genetic Characterization.

Inherited macular dystrophies refer to a group of degenerative conditions that predominantly affect the macula in the spectrum of inherited retinal dystrophies. Recent trends indicate a clear need for genetic assessment services in tertiary referral hospitals. However, establishing such a service can be a complex task due to the diverse skills required and multiple professionals involved. This review aims to provide comprehensive guidelines to enhance the genetic characterization of patients and improve counselling efficacy by combining updated literature with our own experiences. Through this review, we hope to contribute to the establishment of state-of-the-art genetic counselling services for inherited macular dystrophies.

Improved Rod Sensitivity as Assessed by Two-Color Dark-Adapted Perimetry in Patients With RPE65-Related Retinopathy Treated With Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate rod-mediated function with two-color dark-adapted perimetry (2cDAP) in patients with RPE65-related retinopathy treated with voretigene neparvovec-rzyl. Methods: Following dilation and dark adaptation, 2cDAP and FST were performed. The 2cDAP was measured on an Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag-Streit) with cyan (500 nm wavelength) and red (650 nm wavelength) stimuli. Hill of vision (HOV) analysis was performed on 2cDAP perimetry with Visual Field Modeling and Analysis (VFMA). Full field threshold stimulus testing (FST) was also measured as a secondary measure of rod-mediated function, and assessed on a Diagnosys Espion with the ColorDome stimulator (Diagnosys LLC). Results: Eight eyes from 4 patients who were treated with voretigene bilaterally had rod function assessed by 2cDAP testing at least 1 year after treatment. There was statistically significant improvement in 2cDAP following gene augmentation therapy. HOV VFMA analysis showed widespread improvements that extended beyond the treatment bleb and statistically significant improvement in HOV analysis volumetric measurements post-treatment to cyan and red stimuli. FST testing performed in six eyes from three patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement to all chromatic stimuli following treatment. Conclusions: These findings demonstrated statistically significant improvement in 2cDAP and FST following treatment with voretigene. Translational Relevance: These findings provide a sensitive method of assessing rod-mediated function in a topographic manner that may be useful in future clinical trials for inherited retinal dystrophies.

Voretigene Neparvovec for the Treatment of RPE65-associated Retinal Dystrophy: Consensus and Recommendations from the Korea RPE65-IRD Consensus Paper Committee.

Mutations in the RPE65 gene, associated with Leber congenital amaurosis, early-onset severe retinal dystrophy, and retinitis pigmentosa, gained growing attention since gene therapy for patients with RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy is available in clinical practice. RPE65 gene accounts for a very small proportion of patients with inherited retinal degeneration, especially Asian patients. Because RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy shares common clinical characteristics, such as early-onset severe nyctalopia, nystagmus, low vision, and progressive visual field constriction, with retinitis pigmentosa by other genetic mutations, appropriate genetic testing is essential to make a correct diagnosis. Also, fundus abnormalities can be minimal in early childhood, and the phenotype is highly variable depending on the type of mutations in RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy, which makes a diagnostic difficulty. The aim of this paper is to review the epidemiology of RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy, mutation spectrum, genetic diagnosis, clinical characteristics, and voretigene neparvovec, a gene therapy product for the treatment of RPE65-related retinal dystrophy.

Full-field Scotopic Threshold Improvement after Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl Treatment Correlates with Chorioretinal Atrophy.

PURPOSE: To analyze demographic and ophthalmic data in patients with and without chorioretinal atrophy after voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (VN) to identify possible causes for this phenomenon. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with longitudinal follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 71 eyes of 38 patients aged 2 to 44 years with RPE65-mediated retinal dystrophy treated with VN across 2 large gene therapy centers in the United States and Germany. METHODS: Patients treated with VN who developed atrophy were compared with those who did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gender, age, surgical center, spherical equivalent refraction, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), baseline full-field scotopic threshold testing (FST), and posttreatment change in FST. RESULTS: A total of 20 eyes of 12 patients developed atrophy after treatment with VN (28% of all eyes). There was no significant difference in gender, age, surgical center, or spherical equivalent refraction between the atrophy group and the no atrophy group. However, patients between school age and young adulthood were predominantly affected, whereas the youngest and the oldest patients did not develop atrophy. Baseline BCVA was better in patients who developed atrophy than those who did not (P = 0.006). The postoperative improvement in FST at 1 month was significantly higher in the atrophy group than in the no atrophy group (P = 0.0005), and this difference remained statistically significant at 1 year (P = 0.0001). There was no correlation to baseline FST, to inflammation, or to which eye was treated first. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of FST improvement after VN appears to be strongly correlated with the development of VN-related chorioretinal atrophy. This finding raises the possibility that atrophy may develop as a toxic or metabolic sequela of vector-mediated RPE65 expression. In light of the expanding number of retinal gene therapy clinical trials, this complication warrants further study because it may not be limited to VN. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Subretinal deposits in young patients treated with voretigene neparvovec-rzyl for RPE65-mediated retinal dystrophy.

We report a series of three young patients (ages: 22 months, 2 years, and 5 years) who developed subretinal deposits at post-operative week one following subretinal voretigene neparvovec-rzyl treatment for RPE65-mediated retinal dystrophy. In the 5-year-old, subretinal deposits were also observed in the inferior periphery of both eyes. All three patients experienced improved visual function with treatment, and both the macular and inferior subretinal deposits have improved or resolved over the follow-up period. These findings may inform the delivery parameters and safety profile of AAV-based gene therapy as the number of retinal gene therapy trials continues to grow.

Retinal gene therapy in RPE-65 gene mediated inherited retinal dystrophy.

BACKGROUND: Voretigene neparvovec (VN) is a gene therapeutic agent for treatment of retinal dystrophies caused by bi-allelic RPE65 mutations. We illustrate, both the benefits and pitfalls associated with ocular gene therapy in the same patient. METHODS: Two eyes of one patient with bi-allelic RPE65 mutations have been treated with VN. The clinical examinations included visual acuity (VA, in normal and low luminance), colour vision, contrast sensitivity, International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standard retinal electrophysiology and dark-adapted full-field stimulus threshold (FST), Goldmann VF analysis and imaging studies, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and autofluorescence. These were performed at baseline, 2-weeks, 3 and 6-months, 1 and 2-years follow-up. RESULTS: The first eye showed improvement in rod photoreceptor function with increased peripheral and low luminance vision (baseline VA: 0.9 logMAR and 2-years post-operative VA: 0.7 logMAR). The second eye, whilst showing increased light sensitivity, suffered a drop in central vision (at 2-weeks) with loss of foveal photoreceptors as shown by the loss of ellipsoid zone on OCT scan (baseline VA: 0.6, 2-year post-operative VA: 1.2). FST improvements were maintained in both eyes indicating a sustained efficacy of VN with little waning of its effect. CONCLUSIONS: We present a previously unreported adverse complication of subretinal VN therapy in bi-allelic RPE65, indicating a probable immune response in treatment of the second eye, resulting in loss of foveal photoreceptors. This case-series highlights the potential and pitfalls of retinal gene therapy in the same patient. The immune responses of the body to a 'foreign vector', remains a challenge.

Lessons Learned from the Development of the First FDA-Approved Gene Therapy Drug, Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl.

In the 5 years following U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the first gene therapy reagent approved to treat a genetic disease, voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (Luxturna), retinal disease clinics, hospital pharmacies, operating rooms, and even health insurance entities around the world have incorporated gene therapy as a standard procedure. The success of Luxturna has helped pave the way to establish a template for developing other gene therapy reagents that promise to restore sight or halt the progression of photoreceptor cell loss in both inherited and acquired retinal diseases. Here we review lessons learned from development of a gene therapy drug for RPE65 disease and how these lessons may expedite the development of additional treatments for previously untreatable blinding conditions.

[Gene therapy for hereditary eye diseases].

Inherited retinal disorders (IRD) are a common cause of severe visual impairment among children and young adults in Denmark. Gene therapy with voretigene neparvovec for a specific, and in Denmark common, cause of IRD (RPE65-related retinal dystrophy) was implemented as standard clinical practice in 2020 as the first of its kind. Twelve Danish patients have been treated with very positive outcomes. Genetically based therapies for other genetic causes of IRD are underway in clinical trials and are expected to change the outlooks for patients who would otherwise become blind early in life.

[Gene therapy treatment based on an ophthalmic indication in hereditary retinal dystrophy caused by RPE65 biallelic gene mutation.] / Szemészeti javallat alapján végzett génterápiás kezelés RPE65 biallelikus génmutáció okozta öröklodo ideghártya-dystrophiában.

INTRODUCTION: Leber's congenital amaurosis is a genetically determined disease belonging to the group of hereditary retinal dystrophies that leads to significant visual impairment in childhood. The disease initially causes a concentric narrowing of the visual field and, with time, loss of central vision. The RPE65 gene mutation-related retinal dystrophy is the first ophthalmic disease for which gene therapy is available using voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals AG, Basel, Switzerland). OBJECTIVE: To present the treatment outcomes of Hungarian patients who were the first to receive voretigene neparvovec gene therapy for the RPE65 biallelic gene mutation. METHOD: Two patients with RPE65 biallelic gene mutations confirmed by genetic testing received voretigene neparvovec gene therapy in one eye each. Before treatment and during the follow-up period, we assessed the best corrected visual acuity, the central retinal thickness, the degree of visual field defects and performed electrophysiological studies. RESULTS: Both the best corrected visual acuity (+3 letters in the older sibling and +10 letters in the younger sibling) and the degree of visual field narrowing improved in both patients. The change in visual function resulted in a significant improvement in the quality of life of our patients. CONCLUSION: Postoperative outcomes of our patients correlate with the results of clinical trials. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(48): 1923-1931.

Visual function and retinal changes after voretigene neparvovec treatment in children with biallelic RPE65-related inherited retinal dystrophy.

To report quantitative retinal changes assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in children treated with voretigene neparvovec (VN) at a single center in Italy. Retrospective review of six consecutive pediatric patients with biallelic RPE65-related dystrophy treated bilaterally with VN. SD-OCT scans were analyzed to extract Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) thickness maps of the whole retina and the outer nuclear layer (ONL). Changes in visual function were assessed by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal morphology at Days 30/45 and 180. BCVA significantly improved at Day 30/45 and 6 months (both P < 0.001). Central foveal retinal thickness and central foveal ONL thickness tended to increase (6.4 ± 19.2 µm; P = 0.080 and 3.42 ± 7.68 µm; P = 0.091, respectively). ONL thickness of the internal ETDRS-ring significantly increased at day 30/45 (4.7 ± 8.4 µm; P < 0.001) and day 180 (5.0 ± 5.7 µm; P = 0.009). Intra-operative foveal detachment was not associated with a higher function gain in terms of BCVA, but with a mild thinning of foveal ONL after treatment. The improvement of BCVA and thickening of the ONL layer suggest that improvement of visual acuity could be related to partial recovery of retinal morphology in the perifoveal ring.

Update on Viral Gene Therapy Clinical Trials for Retinal Diseases.

In 2001, the first large animal was successfully treated with a gene therapy that restored its vision. Lancelot, the Briard dog that was treated, suffered from a human childhood blindness called Leber's congenital amaurosis type 2. Sixteen years later, the gene therapy was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The success of this gene therapy in dogs led to a fast expansion of the ocular gene therapy field. By now every class of inherited retinal dystrophy has been treated in at least one animal model and many clinical trials have been initiated in humans. In this study, we review the status of viral gene therapies for the retina, with a focus on ongoing human clinical trials. It is likely that in the next decade we will see several new viral gene therapies approved.

[Inherited retinal dystrophy: first results of RPE65 gene replacement therapy in Russia]. / Nasledstvennaya distrofiya setchatki: pervye rezul'taty posle RPE65-genozamestitel'noi terapii v Rossii.

PURPOSE: To present the main aspects of interdisciplinary diagnostics of patients with hereditary retinal diseases and the first results of the follow-up of patients with inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) caused by biallelic mutations in the gene RPE65 after gene replacement therapy in Russia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cohort of patients consisted of six children (5-15 years old) with the diagnosis of Leber amaurosis type 2. All patients underwent a multi-disciplinary examination using conventional clinical, instrumental and molecular-genetic methods. Genetic diagnosis was established based on the results of two-stage DNA diagnostics using high-performance parallel sequencing of a custom panel and family segregation analysis by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: In the Research Centre for Medical Genetics the first group of Russian patients with an orphan inherited retinal disease was verified, they underwent subretinal injection of the gene replacement drug Voretigene neparvovec (12 eyes) in the Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases. According to the regulated terms of monitoring gene therapy patients, they were examined in the Research Centre for Medical Genetics after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, and then once per year. Thus, the available data allows us to analyze the first results 3 months after the treatment. CONCLUSION: The presented data on inherited retinal dystrophies caused by biallelic mutations in the RPE65 gene emphasize the need to change the diagnostic algorithm in the ophthalmic practice. The use of clinical instrumental and molecular genetic diagnostic methods makes it possible to apply etiotropic treatment to patients with a disabling disease that was previously considered untreatable. The gene replacement drug Voretigene neparvovec registered in Russia showed irrefutable first positive results in all targeted patients.